Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39844001›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Insulin degludec 100 U/mL for treatment of spontaneous diabetes mellitus in dogs.

Jocelyn Mott, Arnon Gal, Antonio Maria Tardo, Alisa Berg, Riley Claude, Alexis Hoelmer, Mei Lun Mui, Avin Arjoonsingh, Chen Gilor

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jocelyn MottDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2176-9287
Arnon GalDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6449-2812
Antonio Maria TardoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3636-0415
Alisa BergDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Riley ClaudeDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Alexis HoelmerDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Mei Lun MuiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Avin ArjoonsinghDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Chen GilorDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-4135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advantages of insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg100) in the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) include consistent release, predictable glucose-lowering effect, and minimal day-to-day variability. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesTo describe the use of IDeg100 in dogs with DM, level of diabetic control and adverse effects. ANIMALS: Thirty-three client-owned dogs with DM.

methodsA prospective, multi-institutional, uncontrolled study of newly diagnosed or previously insulin-treated, with or without comorbidities and with or without concurrent medications. Clinical signs and continuous glucose monitoring data were monitored and guided insulin dose adjustments. A per-protocol analysis was performed.

resultsThe final dose of IDeg100 in dogs was 1.3 U/kg (median, range, 0.4-2.2) achieved in 14 days (median, range, 3-32). Seventy-nine percent (26/33) of the dogs had comorbidities with 42% (11/26) having more than 1 comorbidity. Sixty-four percent (21/33) of dogs were receiving concurrent medications with 62% (13/21) receiving more than 1 non-insulin medication. Seventy-six percent (25/33) were scored as having excellent/very good DM control. From baseline to study exit, dogs showed improvements in both ALIVE DM clinical score (from 3 [0-8, 96.49% CI (2-5)] to 1 [0-7, 96.49% CI (1-2)]; P = .0007) and average 3-day interstitial glucose (from 332.8 ± 68.7 mg/dL, 95% CI [308.8-357.2] to 229.0 ± 56.3 mg/dL [CI 209.0 - 248.9]; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Insulin degludec 100 U/mL is effective for the treatment of dogs with DM. Eighty-four percent (28/33) of dogs responded to once daily dose of IDeg100 with low frequency of clinical hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDog DiseasesHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin, Long-ActingAnimalsBlood GlucoseDogsProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agentsinsulin degludecInsulin, Long-Actingbasal insulincaninecontinuous glucose monitoringdiabetes mellitusonce‐daily insulintresiba

Identifiers

PMID39844001
PMCPMC11754072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.