Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843971›Full record

ReviewBJC reports2025

Towards greener and more sustainable pre-clinical oncology research.

Cian Campion, Linda Robertson, Ian Stansfield, Valerie Speirs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cian CampionSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Linda RobertsonSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Ian StansfieldSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-7906
Valerie SpeirsSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. valerie.speirs@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0602-4666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-use plastics (SUPs) are used widely in cancer research laboratories. They are cheap, durable, and lightweight, and until now have been considered disposable items. This, however, contributes significantly to unsustainable waste production. SUP waste is typically diverted to landfill or incineration, which contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, taking many years to degrade. Lack of robust SUP waste disposal streams, particularly in cancer research labs has long term effects on the environment. Having identified that a single laboratory researcher in our group generates at least 15 kg SUP tissue culture waste alone each year, we explore some of the issues associated with SUPs in pre-clinical oncology research, discussing potential reuse routes, alternative materials for labware and developing circular approaches to plastic consumption to address the green agenda. We also propose recommendations for improving sustainability in cancer research labs.

Identifiers

PMID39843971
PMCPMC11754472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.