Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843948›Full record

Articlenpj antimicrobials and resistance2024

Antimicrobial peptide glatiramer acetate targets Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharides to breach membranes without altering lipopolysaccharide modification.

Ronan A Murphy, Jade Pizzato, Leah Cuthbertson, Akshay Sabnis, Andrew M Edwards, Laura M Nolan, Thomas Vorup-Jensen, Gerald Larrouy-Maumus, Jane C Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronan A MurphyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. ronan.murphy@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-6563
Jade PizzatoCentre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Leah CuthbertsonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Akshay SabnisCentre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrew M EdwardsCentre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Laura M NolanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7493-4872
Thomas Vorup-JensenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gerald Larrouy-MaumusCentre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jane C DaviesNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/R012504/1RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/N014103/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are key components of innate immunity across all domains of life. Natural and synthetic AMPs are receiving renewed attention in efforts to combat the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis and the loss of antibiotic efficacy. The gram-negative pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most concerning infecting bacteria in AMR, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) where respiratory infections are difficult to eradicate and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cationic AMPs exploit the negatively charged lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on P. aeruginosa to bind and disrupt bacterial membrane(s), causing lethal damage. P. aeruginosa modifies its LPS to evade AMP killing. Free-LPS is also a component of CF sputum and feeds pro-inflammatory cycles. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a random peptide co-polymer-of glycine, lysine, alanine, tyrosine-used as a drug in treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS); we have previously shown GA to be an AMP which synergises with tobramycin against CF P. aeruginosa, functioning via bacterial membrane disruption. Here, we demonstrate GA's direct binding and sequestration/neutralisation of P. aeruginosa LPS, in keeping with GA's ability to disrupt the outer membrane. At CF-relevant LPS concentrations, however, membrane disruption by GA was not strongly inhibited. Furthermore, exposure to GA did not result in increased Lipid A modification of LPS or in increased gene expression of systems involved in AMP sensing and LPS modification. Therefore, despite the electrostatic targeting of LPS by GA as part of its activity, P. aeruginosa does not demonstrate LPS modification in its defence.

Identifiers

PMID39843948
PMCPMC11702655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.