Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843946›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Adoption intensity of soil and water conservation techniques in Burkina Faso is influenced by farmers' preferences for their attributes.

Hadji Adama Ouédraogo, Youmanli Ouoba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hadji Adama OuédraogoInstitute for Environment and Agricultural Research (INERA), National Center of Scientific Research and Technological (CNRST), 01 BP 910, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso. ohadjiadama@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2170-5945
Youmanli OuobaCenter for Economic and Social Studies, Documentation and Research (CEDRES), Thomas Sankara University (UTS), 12 BP 417, Ouagadougou 12, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil degradation is a major cause of agricultural productivity decrease in sub-Saharan Africa. In Burkina Faso, efforts to reduce this environmental issue has emerged since several decades. However, most of the techniques developed are rarely adopted by farmers. In addition, those adopted are on small areas. This study aims to analyze the effect of farmers' preferences for soil and water conservation techniques' attributes on their intensity of adoption. Cross-sectional data was collected from 335 farmers in four rural municipalities in Burkina Faso, using a discrete choice experiment approach. The standard Tobit model was used for data analysis. Results showed that soil and water conservation techniques' attributes as runoff reduction, soil fertilization and soil restoration explained farmers' decision to adopt and intensify the adoption of these techniques. In addition, location in the northern sudanian agroecological zone, access to extension services and education influenced positively soil and water conservation techniques' adoption intensity. However, equipment, labor and cash constraints decrease these techniques' adoption intensity. These results suggest that incentives for the adoption and intensification policies should be oriented toward farmers' capacities to produce quantity and quality organic fertilizers reinforcement, build an industrial unit to transform household waste into organic manure for agricultural use.

Indexed as

Burkina FasoConditional logitDiscrete choice experimentSoil and water conservationTobit

Identifiers

PMID39843946
PMCPMC11754463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.