Articlenpj antimicrobials and resistance2023
Known mechanisms cannot account for a third of reduced susceptibility in non-aureus staphylococci.
Article in npj antimicrobials and resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CoNS blood culture isolates from very preterm infants: antibiotic susceptibility, synergy testing andJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Review
- Revealing the clinical relevance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Molecular Characterization of Cefoxitin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci From Frequently Touched Surfaces of Hospital and Urban-Built Environments of Central India.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Article
- Sticking together: independent evolution of biofilm formation in different species of staphylococci has occurred multiple times via different pathways.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) are implicated in many healthcare-acquired infections and an understanding of the genetics of antimicrobial resistance is important in relation to both clinical intervention and the role of NAS as a reservoir of resistance genes. Gap statement: The burden of antimicrobial resistance in NAS, particularly to clinically relevant antimicrobials, is under-recognised. We sourced 394 NAS isolates from clinical samples, healthy human volunteers, animals and type cultures and subjected them to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing by agar dilution using eight antimicrobials. Cefoxitin was used to screen for methicillin resistance, as it stimulates the expression of mecA in S. aureus. We performed whole genome sequencing on 366 isolates and analysed these genotypically for the presence of genetic mechanisms responsible for the phenotypic levels of reduced antimicrobial susceptibility. We observed 175 sequenced isolates with a MIC ≥ 4 µg/ml to cefoxitin, of which 50% did not harbour a known mec homologue. Eight clinical NAS isolates displayed high daptomycin MICs (>4 µg/ml), with no known mechanism identified. Differences in MICs against erythromycin were attributable to the presence of different resistance genes (msrA and ermC). In total, 49% of isolates displayed reduced susceptibility to three or more of the antimicrobials tested. The widespread presence of reduced antimicrobial susceptibility in NAS is concerning. An increased likelihood of harder-to-treat infections caused directly by NAS with acquired resistance genes has clinical implications for AMR detection, the horizontal resistance gene pool and the management of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.