ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neural processing of naturalistic audiovisual events in space and time.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Naturalistic Movie Neuroimaging Through Film Form.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multisensory coding of audiovisual movies in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Echoes of the mind's eye: Reciprocal crossmodal interaction between auditory and visual processing.iScience · 2026Article
- Achieving more human brain-like vision via human EEG representational alignment.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Sensory Processing of Time and Space in Autistic Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A large-scale MEG and EEG dataset for object recognition in naturalistic scenes.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Neural processing of naturalistic audiovisual events in space and time.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Contrast affects stimulus detection in natural scenes.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our brain seamlessly integrates distinct sensory information to form a coherent percept. However, when real-world audiovisual events are perceived, the specific brain regions and timings for processing different levels of information remain less investigated. To address that, we curated naturalistic videos and recorded functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) data when participants viewed videos with accompanying sounds. Our findings reveal early asymmetrical cross-modal interaction, with acoustic information represented in both early visual and auditory regions, while visual information only identified in visual cortices. The visual and auditory features were processed with similar onset but different temporal dynamics. High-level categorical and semantic information emerged in multisensory association areas later in time, indicating late cross-modal integration and its distinct role in converging conceptual information. Comparing neural representations to a two-branch deep neural network model highlighted the necessity of early cross-modal connections to build a biologically plausible model of audiovisual perception. With EEG-fMRI fusion, we provided a spatiotemporally resolved account of neural activity during the processing of naturalistic audiovisual stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.