ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used for many years to study the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on single- or dual-pulse TMS and EMG and/or single motor unit (MU) recordings, many groups have described a loss of central inhibition as an early marker of ALS dysfunction, reflecting a state of cortical 'hyperexcitability'. This conclusion is not without its detractors, however, leading us to reexamine this issue using 4-pulse TMS, shown previously to be more effective for testing central motor pathway functional integrity. A total of 221 motor units were tested in 13 subjects (6 controls; 7 with ALS) across a total of 798 unique TMS conditions. MUs were studied from hand muscles (usually first dorsal interosseus) and from tibialis anterior (TA). Subjects were required to recruit a MU to fire rhythmically, during which time 4-pulse trains of TMS were delivered. A given motor unit's recruitment was examined for different stimulus intensities and interpulse intervals (IPI). All motor units from control subjects showed short latency excitation to TMS, and short latency inhibition for TMS pulses of slightly weaker intensity (i.e. the threshold for inhibition was lower than that for excitation). The same was largely true for MUs studied in subjects with ALS, with the primary difference between control and ALS subjects being the need for stronger stimulus intensities to effect recruitment in subjects with ALS. We saw no evidence for a loss or reduction of inhibition of central motor output in persons with ALS, at least when tested during voluntary contractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39843865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.