ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Automated Detection of Cancer-Suspicious Findings in Japanese Radiology Reports with Natural Language Processing: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated classification of clinical T staging pulmonary oncology from chest CT reports: a natural language processing framework for real-world data utilization.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- ModernBERT is more efficient than conventional BERT for chest CT findings classification in Japanese radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Natural Language Processing-Based Triage of Superficial Soft Tissue Ultrasound Reports in Orthopedic Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The incremental value of unstructured data via natural language processing in machine learning-based COVID-19 mortality prediction: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missed critical imaging findings, particularly those indicating cancer, are a common issue that can result in delays in patient follow-up and treatment. To address this, we developed a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to detect cancer-suspicious findings from Japanese radiology reports. The dataset used consisted of chest and abdomen CT reports from six institutions. Reports from our institution were used for algorithm development and internal evaluation, while reports from the other five institutions were used for external evaluation. To create the gold standard, reports were annotated by two experienced physicians. Data were statistically analyzed using precision, recall and F1 score with 1000 bootstrap iterations. BERT was used as a baseline deep learning model, and its performance was compared with the proposed rule-based method. At the report level of detection, the overall precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.886, 0.886, and 0.883, respectively, for the rule-based algorithm, which were higher than those of the deep learning algorithm (0.851, 0.679, and 0.733). The overall results include both internal and external validation data. For the internal validation set, the precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.929, 0.929, and 0.927, respectively. For the external validation set, the precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.875, 0.879, and 0.873, demonstrating generalizability. In conclusion, we show the rule-based NLP algorithm exhibited a high performance in detecting cancer-suspicious findings from multi-institutional CT reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.