Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843717›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Automated Detection of Cancer-Suspicious Findings in Japanese Radiology Reports with Natural Language Processing: A Multicenter Study.

Kento Sugimoto, Shoya Wada, Shozo Konishi, Junya Sato, Katsuki Okada, Shoji Kido, Noriyuki Tomiyama, Yasushi Matsumura, Toshihiro Takeda

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kento SugimotoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan. sugimoto.kento@hp-info.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6874-2399
Shoya WadaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Shozo KonishiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Junya SatoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Shoji KidoOsaka University Institute for Radiation Sciences, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi MatsumuraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Toshihiro TakedaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23K19977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missed critical imaging findings, particularly those indicating cancer, are a common issue that can result in delays in patient follow-up and treatment. To address this, we developed a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to detect cancer-suspicious findings from Japanese radiology reports. The dataset used consisted of chest and abdomen CT reports from six institutions. Reports from our institution were used for algorithm development and internal evaluation, while reports from the other five institutions were used for external evaluation. To create the gold standard, reports were annotated by two experienced physicians. Data were statistically analyzed using precision, recall and F1 score with 1000 bootstrap iterations. BERT was used as a baseline deep learning model, and its performance was compared with the proposed rule-based method. At the report level of detection, the overall precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.886, 0.886, and 0.883, respectively, for the rule-based algorithm, which were higher than those of the deep learning algorithm (0.851, 0.679, and 0.733). The overall results include both internal and external validation data. For the internal validation set, the precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.929, 0.929, and 0.927, respectively. For the external validation set, the precision, recall, and F-1 score were 0.875, 0.879, and 0.873, demonstrating generalizability. In conclusion, we show the rule-based NLP algorithm exhibited a high performance in detecting cancer-suspicious findings from multi-institutional CT reports.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingNeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansJapanActionable findingsInformation extractionNatural language processingRadiology report

Identifiers

PMID39843717
PMCPMC12572415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.