Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843668›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2025

Associations Between Early Physician Follow-up and Post-discharge Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jia Qi Adam Bai, Thulasie Manokaran, Levi Meldrum, Karen L Tang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reframing "No-Show": Patient-Reported Barriers for Missed Post-Hospital Discharge Primary Care Follow-Up Visits.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jia Qi Adam BaiFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Thulasie ManokaranDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Levi MeldrumW21C Research and Innovation Initiative, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen L TangDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. klktang@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9008-2289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly physician follow-up after hospital discharge is commonly recommended, though whether it mitigates adverse events is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between physician follow-up within 30 days of hospital discharge and risk of hospital readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, or mortality in medical patients.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2023. Inclusion criteria were original studies that reported association(s) between outpatient physician visit within 30 days of hospital discharge and at least one outcome of interest (emergency department visit, readmission, or mortality) for adult medical patients. Two investigators independently completed screening, extracted data, and assessed study quality using an adapted Down's and Black tool. Meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome using random effects models.

resultsSixty-six studies were included in the review. Early physician follow-up was significantly associated with reduced odds of hospital readmission (pooled OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58, 0.81], n=54) and mortality (pooled OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55, 0.90], n=21) but not emergency department visits (pooled OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59, 1.01], n=10). A majority of studies were at high risk of selection bias or residual confounding or both. When pooling only studies at low risk of bias in these domains or when only pooling randomized controlled trials, associations between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission were not statistically significant (pooled OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.93, 1.09], n=11; and 1.07 [95% CI 0.85, 1.36], n=5; respectively). DISCUSSION: While meta-analysis suggests that early physician follow-up may be associated with reduced readmissions and mortality, there is a need to interpret these results with caution given that a majority of included studies were observational in nature and were at high risk of bias. It therefore remains unclear whether early physician follow-up is effective in reducing post-discharge adverse events of readmission, emergency department visits, and mortality. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022334467.

Indexed as

AftercarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPhysiciansEmergency Service, HospitalHumanshospital readmissionphysician follow-upsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39843668
PMCPMC12052959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.