Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843664›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Disparities in Access and Utilization of Electronic Health Record Patient Portals.

Atman Shah, Mark A Fiala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. More Older Adults Try Patient Portals in Recent Years, but Many Don't Continue: A Meta-Analysis.Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atman ShahSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mark A FialaDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. mfiala@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-5023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess changes in the accessibility and utilization of electronic health record patient portals in recent years, focusing on whether these changes occurred equitably across different racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study utilized nationally representative samples from the 2019 and 2022 Health Information National Trends Surveys. A difference-in-differences design was used to determine if increases in access and utilization occurred equally for all segments of the population.

resultsFrom 2019 to 2022, the proportion of people reporting being offered access to a patient portal by a healthcare provider increased from 72.3 to 83.7% and the proportion who reported using a portal increased from 68.0 to 81.9%. African American or Black respondents had similar increases in access and utilization of portals as non-Hispanic Whites, but disparities remained. Hispanics, who were more likely to utilize patient portals in 2019, saw a smaller increase in utilization than non-Hispanic Whites. Increasing disparities in access and/or utilization of patient portals was observed among people with lower household incomes, people without college degrees, and people over the age of 65.

conclusionAn increased reliance on digital healthcare technologies has increased patient portal accessibility and utilization; however, increases have not been equitable across all demographic groups with many disparities persisting or worsening.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PortalsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Access to RecordsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adultdisparitieselectronic health recordshealth inequitypatient portals

Identifiers

PMID39843664
PMCPMC12344056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.