ArticleBrain topography2025
Eeg Microstates and Balance Parameters for Stroke Discrimination: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain temporal dynamics correlate with clinical traits, spontaneous arm movements, and recovery in middle cerebral artery stroke.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography microstates (EEG-MS) show promise to be a neurobiological biomarker in stroke. Thus, the aim of the study was to identify biomarkers to discriminate stroke patients from healthy individuals based on EEG-MS and clinical features using a machine learning approach. Fifty-four participants (27 stroke patients and 27 healthy age and sex-matched controls) were recruited. We recorded EEG-MS using 32 channels during eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions and analyzed the four classical EEG-MS maps (A, B, C, D). Clinical information and motor aspects were evaluated. A machine learning method using k-means algorithms to discriminate stroke patients from healthy subjects showed that the most influential parameters in clustering were balance scores and microstate parameters (duration and coverage of microstate A, duration, coverage and occurrence of microstates C and global variance explained). To evaluate the quality of clustering, the Silhouette score was applied and the score was close to 0.20, indicating that the clusters overlap. These results are encouraging and support the usefulness of these methods for classifying stroke patients in order to contribute to the development of therapeutic strategies, improve the clinical management of these patients, and consequently reduce the associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39843623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.