ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Effects of data-driven respiratory gating on visualization and quantification of breast and upper abdominal cancers in FDG PET/CT examinations.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveData-driven respiratory gating (DDG) has recently been introduced to improve image quality in the PET portion of PET/CT examinations. The latest DDG system does not require any external equipment or extended examination time. In this study, we investigated the effects of the new DDG system on the visualization and quantification of breast and upper abdominal cancers, comparing the results with those obtained using the standard free-breathing (STD) PET protocol.
methodsA total of 223 cancer lesions (138 breast and 85 upper abdominal) evaluated with FDG PET/CT were included in this study. PET images were reconstructed using the STD and DDG algorithms. Lesion blurring and conspicuity were each visually graded on a three-point scale. The longest diameter (LD), SUVmax, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the lesions were used for quantitative analysis. % change in SUVmax or MTV was calculated from the metrics in STD and DDG images. Fifty-six texture features (TFs) were also evaluated. Visual scores and quantitative metrics were compared between STD and DDG images. % change in SUVmax or MTV was compared in the lesion location groups or in the high and low groups based on LD, SUVmax, or MTV in STD images.
resultsVisual scores for lesion blurring and conspicuity were both significantly higher in DDG than in STD PET images. SUVmax and MTV were significantly higher and lower, respectively, in DDG than in STD images. An increase in SUVmax and a decrease in MTV were observed in 96% and 86% of all lesions, respectively. Group analysis revealed that % change in SUVmax was greater in the upper abdominal than the breast lesions and % change in MTV was greater in the high LD and high MTV groups than in the low LD and low MTV groups, respectively. Quantitative changes in TFs were observed between STD and DDG images for most of the features.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that DDG improved visualization and quantification of breast and upper abdominal cancers in FDG PET/CT examinations. DDG PET images exhibited an increase in SUVmax, a decrease in MTV, and changes in TFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.