Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843611›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Autograft dilation after Ross procedure in children and young adults is mitigated by autograft reinforcement: A retrospective MRI study.

Raphael Seiler, Robin Stenzel, Viktoria Weixler, Milena Muiznieks, Marina Gürtner, Felix Berger, Titus Kühne, Mi-Young Cho, Joachim Photiadis, Marcus Kelm and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Ross Operation in Children-What Is the Long-Term Fate of the Autograft?Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Optimized outcome of the Ross procedure in children: single-centre experience†.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Raphael SeilerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. raphael.seiler@dhzc-charite.de.
Robin StenzelCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Viktoria WeixlerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Milena MuiznieksCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marina GürtnerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BergerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital Heart Disease - Pediatric Cardiology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Titus KühneDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Mi-Young ChoDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Joachim PhotiadisDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus Kelm *Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Peter Murin *Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on autograft dilatation following the Ross procedure in congenital cohorts presents challenges in understanding its evolution and impact on clinical outcomes. This study, spanning from February 2003 to December 2022, included patients under 40 years at the time of the Ross procedure, with MRI follow-ups assessing dimensions at key aortic sites. Among 307 patients, 132 MRIs were analyzed from 76 individuals, revealing that autograft z-scores increase primarily with time post-procedure (Coef. 0.13; 95% CI:0.051-0.216; P = 0.002). Additionally, older patients at the time of surgery showed larger ascending aortic dimensions (Coef. 0.13; 95% CI:0.099-0.165; P = 0.001). Notably, autograft dilation at the sinus of Valsalva significantly predicted higher reintervention risks (HR 1.57; 95% CI:1.21-2.04; P = 0.001). Surgical reinforcement techniques of the autograft, via subcoronary implantation or external support, prevented such dilation (P < 0.001) and mitigated aortic regurgitation. In conclusion, our model predicted autograft dilation over time in patients after Ross procedure, aiding clinicians in making data-driven decisions regarding the optimal timing of the procedure and the selection of the most effective surgical strategy.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAutograftsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAortaAortic Valve InsufficiencyChildChild, PreschoolDilatation, PathologicFemaleHumansInfantMalePulmonary ValveRetrospective StudiesAortic diseaseAutograft dilationAutograft reinforcementCardiac MRICongenital heart diseaseRoss procedure

Identifiers

PMID39843611
PMCPMC11754628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.