ArticleScientific reports2025
Sex differences in patients with working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy After Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries or Takotsubo Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Multimodality Imaging to Determine Underlying Causes of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Women and Men.Circulation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) constitutes 3-15% of all acute myocardial infarctions. Women are more frequently diagnosed with MINOCA, although the influence of sex on long-term outcomes is still unclear. In this study we aimed to compare sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected MINOCA. We have retrospectively analyzed 6063 patients diagnosed with MINOCA (3220 females and 2843 male patients) from combined 3 large polish registries (PL-ACS, SILCARD and AMI-PL). Male patients were significantly younger (63 (55-74) vs. 71 (61-79) years, p < 0.05) and less frequently diabetic (20.1% vs. 24.1%, p < 0.05). Mortality was significantly higher in male population (11.8% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.05 at 1 year and 17.6% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.05 at 3 years). Male sex was an independent predictor of both mortality (HR = 1.29; CI 1.11-1.51; p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (HR = 1.39; CI 1.1-1.75, p < 0.05) at 3 years follow-up. All-cause readmission rates were similar in male and female patients both at 1 year (46.0% vs. 44.4, p = 0.2) and 3 years follow-up (56.4% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.93). However, cardiovascular readmissions were more prevalent in male patients at both timepoints (33.9% vs. 29.10%, p < 0.05 at 1 year, and 41.0% vs. 37.6%, p < 0.05 at 3 years). This large-scale registry-based analysis demonstrated higher 3 years rates of adverse events, including death and MI among male patients with suspected MINOCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.