ArticleScientific data2025
An updated reference genome of Barbatula barbatula (Linnaeus, 1758).
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An updated reference genome of Barbatula barbatula (Linnaeus, 1758).Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The stone loach Barbatula barbatula is a benthic fish species widely distributed throughout Europe, primarily inhabiting stony upper sections of stream networks. This study presents an updated genome assembly of B. barbatula, contributing to the species' available genomic resources for downstream applications such as conservation genetics. The draft assembly was 550 Mbp in size, with an N50 of 11.21 Mbp. We used the species' available chromosome scaffolds to finish the genome. The final assembly had a BUSCO score of 96.7%. We identified 23270 protein-coding genes, and the proteome exhibited high completeness with BUSCO (93.1%) and OMArk (90.81%). Despite using multiple approaches to reduce duplicate contigs, we observed a relatively high duplicate ratio of 6.1% (BUSCO) and 8.52% (OMArk) in the annotations. We aimed to find microsatellite loci present in both the species' publicly available genome and the new assembly to aid marker development for downstream analyses. This dataset serves as a reference for genomic analysis and is useful for developing markers to study the species' biodiversity and support conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.