ArticleScientific reports2025
Modified titanium post with polished sidewalls and prefabricated shoulders can effectively preserve the teeth with subgingival defects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy and mechanical characteristics of the modified titanium post in the restoration of subgingival defect teeth. Teeth with subgingival defects depth ≥ 2 mm were randomly restored using a fiber post after crown lengthening and a modified titanium post, respectively. Gingival index, sulcus bleeding index, probing depth, tooth mobility, and gingival papilla height were recorded before and after restoration. Tooth models with a 4 mm subgingival defect, which then underwent fiber post restoration after crown lengthening and modified titanium post restoration respectively, was established. The stresses in the tooth and tooth-supporting structures were measured under vertical and horizontal loads. The gingival index, sulcus bleeding index, and probing depth in the titanium post groups did not show significant differences compared to those of the crown lengthening group. However, the tooth mobility, gingival papilla height, and stress distribution in the tooth and periodontal tissue were significantly better in the titanium post than those in crown lengthening group. Teeth restored with modified titanium post had a healthy periodontal status, clinical efficacy and stress distribution in dental and periodontal tissues were superior to the teeth restored with crown lengthening. However, longer term observation was still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.