Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843488›Full record

ReviewNPJ Regenerative medicine2025

Revitalizing the heart: strategies and tools for cardiomyocyte regeneration post-myocardial infarction.

Axelle Bois, Catarina Grandela, James Gallant, Christine Mummery, Philippe Menasché

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immature and mature myocardium in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Nuclear Autoantigenic Sperm Protein Promotes Cardiac Regeneration and Repair Through Activating the PDGFRB/AKT Pathway.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Axelle BoisDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Catarina GrandelaDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
James GallantDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christine MummeryDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.l.mummery@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-6535
Philippe MenaschéDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) causes the loss of millions of cardiomyocytes, and current treatments do not address this root issue. New therapies focus on stimulating cardiomyocyte division in the adult heart, inspired by the regenerative capacities of lower vertebrates and neonatal mice. This review explores strategies for heart regeneration, offers insights into cardiomyocyte proliferation, evaluates in vivo models, and discusses integrating in vitro human cardiac models to advance cardiac regeneration research.

Identifiers

PMID39843488
PMCPMC11754855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.