Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843486›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Contribution of type 2 diabetes to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a long-term observational study with different stages of atherosclerosis.

Arthur Mader, Dario Haeberli, Barbara Larcher, Jörn F Dopheide, Christoph H Saely, Christine F Heinzle, Peter Amann, Marc Schindewolf, Andreas Festa, Heinz Drexel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Long-Acting GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Management.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Decoding the coronary paradox of obesity: not all fat is equal!International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arthur MaderVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria. arthur.mader@lkhf.at.
Dario HaeberliGefäßzentrum Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Barbara LarcherVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Jörn F DopheideVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Christoph H SaelyVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Christine F HeinzleVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Peter AmannVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Marc SchindewolfAngiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Andreas FestaVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Heinz DrexelVIVIT-Institute, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of diabetes on incident cardiovascular disease in relation to the extent of atherosclerotic disease remains unclear. We aimed to investigate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with or without type 2 diabetes (T2DM) presenting with two extremes of atherosclerotic disease, those with angiographically documented minor coronary atherosclerotic lesions and those with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. We included 1238 patients from two prospective, long-term cohort studies. Patients underwent coronary angiography and/or sonography in order to assess the grade of atherosclerosis and were defined as having no signs of Atherosclerosis (n = 332; Group I), minor atherosclerosis (n = 425; Group II) and major atherosclerosis (n = 481; Group III). Cardiovascular events were recorded over a median follow-up period of 7.1 years (Q1 = 3.6 years, Q2 = 7.1 years, Q3 = 11.3 years), covering a total of 9533 patient years. We tested the hypothesis that T2DM infers the same relative risk increase irrespective of the atherosclerosis stage, considering 3-point MACE as the primary endpoint. Incident MACE was reported in 681 patients (51%). MACE occurred more frequently in patients with T2DM than in patients without T2DM (p < 0.001). Further, MACE occurred more frequently in group III (58.1%), than group II (34.1%) or group I (19.1%) (group I vs. group II vs. group III, p < 0.001). In a cox-regression-model, T2DM was a significant predictor of MACE in univariate analyses (HR = 2.43 [1.88-3.14], p < 0.001) and after multivariate adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, as well as the different grades of atherosclerosis (HR = 1.37 [1.02-1.84], p = 0.034). Also, atherosclerosis grades predicted MACE (HR = 3.19 [2.75-3.70], p < 0.001) in univariate analyses, and also after multivariate adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors, including T2DM (HR = 1.61 [1.31-1.98], p < 0.001). Finally, when testing for interactions between T2DM and stages of atherosclerosis on MACE we could not find any significant interaction (HR = 1.14 [0.86-1.52], p = 0.364). We conclude that T2DM infers an increased risk for MACE across anatomically and morphologically distinct stages of atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2AgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAtherosclerosisCoronary heart diseaseDiabetes mellitus type 2ImagingLower extremity artery diseaseMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsProspective studyVascular bed

Identifiers

PMID39843486
PMCPMC11754429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.