Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843480›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of two plates and screw osteosynthesis configurations in a rat model of critical sized femoral defects to reduce implant related failures.

Marc Saab, Anne-Sophie Drucbert, Nicolas Blanchemain, Feng Chai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc SaabService d'Orthopédie 1 et Traumatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, F-59000, France. marc.saab@outlook.com.
Anne-Sophie DrucbertU1008 - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Nicolas BlanchemainU1008 - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
Feng ChaiU1008 - Advanced Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the failure rates of two different sizes of plates and screws to stabilize critical-sized (7 mm) femoral defects in male Sprague‒Dawley rats (aged 10 weeks). Femoral defects were stabilized with either a 4-hole plate (length 29 mm, thickness 1 mm, 10 rats, Group 1) and 4 cortical screws (diameter 2 mm) or with a 6-hole plate (length 30 mm, thickness 0.6 mm, 9 rats, Group 2) and 4 cortical screws (diameter 1.5 mm). A polymethylmethacrylate spacer was inserted into the defects to reproduce the first stage of the induced membrane technique. Radiographic evaluations, macroscopic and histologic assessments of the induced membranes were conducted at 1 week and 4 weeks. No implant failure occurred in Group 1 whereas in Group 2, 4/9 (44.4%) implant failures occurred during the follow-up (p = 0.03). On histomorphometry, cell density was higher in Group 1 (4996 ± 716 cells / mm²) than in Group 2 (3500 ± 728 cells/mm²) (p = 0.0195) but the membrane thickness in Group 1 (735 ± 44 μm) was non-significantly lower than in Group 2 (979 ± 165 μm) (p = 0.4). This study suggests that, in rat models of critical-sized femoral defects (7 mm) to study the induced membrane technique, fixation plates with a thickness of 1 mm and four screws (2 mm in diameter) provide stable fixation without implant failure. In contrast, thinner plates (< 1 mm) combined with screws of smaller diameter (1.5 mm) result in a high rate of implant failure.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesBone ScrewsFemoral FracturesFemurFracture Fixation, InternalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleProsthesis FailureRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyFemoral defectsInduced membrane techniqueMasquelet techniqueRat model

Identifiers

PMID39843480
PMCPMC11754782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.