Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843393›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2025

Motivations for Abortion or Continuation of an Unwanted Pregnancy: A Scoping Review of the Global Literature.

Wieke Y Beumer, Annemarie Y A M Reilingh, Eline Dalmijn, Tessa J Roseboom, Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wieke Y BeumerEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-5719
Annemarie Y A M ReilinghObstetrics and Gyneacology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-8662
Eline DalmijnResearch Department, Fiom, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-7077-6944
Tessa J RoseboomEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0564-5994
Jenneke van DitzhuijzenObstetrics and Gyneacology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0560-4949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of recent studies in peer reviewed journals investigating self-reported motivations to have an abortion or to continue an unwanted pregnancy in different countries and settings, including both qualitative and quantitative results.

methodsWe searched for English language publications published between 2008 and 2023 indexed in four scientific databases. We included studies if they captured people's own motivations for abortion and/ or for continuing an unwanted pregnancy.

resultsOf the included 19 studies, all focused on abortion, and four also included motivations to carry an initially unwanted pregnancy to term. Motivations for abortion often related to family planning (e.g., complete family, no desire for children, not the right time), the relationship with the person involved in the pregnancy, and life or material circumstances (such as financial resources, housing or future plans), and sometimes with stigma, shame, or expected negative reactions. Motivations to continue an unwanted pregnancy were having a supportive partner and personal beliefs about the pregnancy. Despite different settings, different methods, and methodological limitations, studies showed similar multifactorial and interrelated motivations in decision making around unwanted pregnancies.

conclusionsThis research showed that in different places throughout the world multiple interrelated motivations play a role in a decision to have an abortion or to continue an unwanted pregnancy. The findings mainly provide insight into retrospective explanatory accounts, which may be biased because respondents may feel the need to justify their choice. Future research should discontinue asking people to rationalize unwanted pregnancy decisions.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedMotivationPregnancy, UnwantedDecision MakingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyabortionpregnancy decision makingscoping reviewunwanted pregnancywomen's health

Identifiers

PMID39843393
PMCPMC11936852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.