ArticleBMJ open2025
Blinding assessment in randomised sham-controlled trials of acupuncture:protocol for a systematic survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evidence mapping the role of acupuncture in diabetes-related obesity: A systematic review and quality assessment.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Fire Needle Therapy for Nocturnal Leg Cramps in Older Adults: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial Protocol.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Critical Appraisal on "Effectiveness and Safety of Nasal Herbal Steam Therapy for Post-Extubation Respiratory Symptoms: A Methodology of Pragmatic Randomized Controlled, Parallel Grouped Study".Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough various sham acupuncture techniques have been employed to ensure blinding in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture, the effectiveness of blinding in these trials and its influence on trial effect size estimates remain unclear. The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to investigate the proportion and study characteristics of sham-controlled trials reporting on blinding assessment, (2) to assess the blinding effectiveness of different types of sham acupuncture, (3) to investigate the relationship between blinding effectiveness and effect sizes in acupuncture RCTs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed and EMBASE from inception to 1 January 2025 to identify RCTs that compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture in humans with any disease or symptom, with no restrictions on language. Paired investigators will independently determine eligibility and use pilot-tested standardised forms for data extraction. We will calculate the proportion of sham-controlled trials that assessed and reported blinding success and conduct descriptive analyses of general study characteristics, acupuncture treatment details, sham acupuncture details and blinding assessments for included trials. We will assess the effectiveness of blinding success using the James blinding index (BI) and Bang BI, and pool data from included trials using random-effects models. We will use Hedges' g, a standardised mean difference, with its 95% CI, to calculate treatment effects. We will use Pearson's r correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between blinding effectiveness and trial effect sizes when variable distributions meet the assumptions of normality and linearity; otherwise, we will consider employing non-parametric tests. When sufficient data are available, we will also use random-effects meta-regression to explore the relationship. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and condensed summaries for clinicians, health policymakers and guideline developers regarding the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of blinded assessment of sham acupuncture RCTs. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B3U7K).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.