Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843372›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Measuring the duration of kangaroo mother care for neonates: a scoping review.

Victor Spector Tumukunde, Eva Loucaides, Melissa M Medvedev, Moffat Nyirenda, Joy Lawn, Cally J Tann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Spector TumukundeFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Victor.tumukunde@mrcuganda.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5113-0604
Eva LoucaidesMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Melissa M MedvedevMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Moffat NyirendaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Joy LawnFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cally J TannMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.

Funding

The OMWaNA Study: Operationalizing kangaroo Mother care among clinically unstable low birth Weight Neonates in AfricaK23HD092611 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MEDVEDEV, MELISSA MORGAN · 2018 to 2023
$948k
Medical Research Council MCR MR/S004971/1NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD092611Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesKangaroo mother care (KMC) is high impact for survival of low birth weight neonates, but there are few rigorous evaluations of duration required for impact. We conducted a scoping review of KMC duration measurement methods and assessed their validation.

designScoping review in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting scoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, African Index Medicus, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, Medrxiv and OpenGrey were searched through November 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Publications with primary data on KMC duration were included. We excluded short procedural skin-to-skin care studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Selection and data abstraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. A data charting form based on the variables of interest was used to abstract data.

resultsA total of 213 publications were included, of which 54 (25%) documented a method of measuring KMC duration. Only 20 publications (9%) provided a detailed description of the duration measurement method, and none reported validity. Most studies used caregiver reports (29, 54%) or healthcare worker observations (17, 31%). Other methods included independent observers and electronic monitoring devices.

conclusionOnly 9% of KMC studies reporting duration documented the measurement method applied, and no studies were found with documented validation of duration measurement methods. Accurate and comparable data on the dose response of KMC will require duration measurement methods to be validated against a gold standard such as an independent observer.

Indexed as

Kangaroo-Mother Care MethodHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornTime FactorsNEONATOLOGYPERINATOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39843372
PMCPMC11758684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.