ArticleBMJ open2025
Short-acting beta agonist, antibiotics, oral corticosteroid and association with mortality and cardiopulmonary events in patients with COPD: a retrospective cohort study in Alberta, Canada.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risk During the 90-Day Vulnerable Window After COPD Exacerbations: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Association of Frequent Short-Acting Beta-Agonist Inhaler Prescriptions with Acute Cardiovascular Events.Pragmatic and observational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of the study was to examine the association between short-acting beta agonist (SABA), antibiotic and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and mortality and cardiopulmonary outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
designRetrospective cohort study using administrative health data from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2020.
settingAlberta, Canada.
participantsPatients ≥35 years old with COPD were identified using diagnostic codes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics included age, sex, geographical zone and comorbidities (as defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index). Outcome variables included all-cause and COPD-related mortality. Outcomes were assessed in consecutive 90-day intervals, starting from cohort entry, paired with time-varying COPD-related medication history in the 1 year preceding each interval. Associations were modelled between mortality and SABA, antibiotic and OCS history, and between major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) death and SABA history.
resultsAmong 188 969 patients, dose-response effects were observed. Adjusting for covariates, rates were higher for patients with 6+ (vs 1) SABA dispenses (all-cause mortality HR: 1.20, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.24, p<0.001; COPD-related mortality HR: 1.40, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.46, p<0.001). Patients receiving 6+ (vs 1-2) antibiotic dispenses had 62% (HR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.66, p<0.001) and 43% (HR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.49, p<0.001) higher rates of all-cause and COPD-related mortality, respectively. Patients experiencing 6+ (vs 1-5) OCS burst-days had 27% (HR: 1.27, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.36, p<0.001) and 29% (HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.40, p<0.001) higher rates of all-cause and COPD-related mortality, respectively. Adjusting for covariates, patients with 2-5 (vs 1) SABA dispenses had higher rates of postexacerbation MACE and CVD death (incidence rate ratio: 1.26, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.36, p<0.001 and 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.40, p<0.001, respectively).
conclusionsOne-year COPD reliever or exacerbation management medication history was associated with higher rates of mortality and postexacerbation MACE (SABA specific).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.