ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025
A noise-robust post-processing pipeline for accelerated phase-cycled
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Triple-PulseMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop an improved post-processing pipeline for noise-robust accelerated phase-cycled Cartesian Single (SQ) and Triple Quantum (TQ) sodium ( THEORY AND
methodsOur pipeline aims to tackle the challenges of
resultsOur denoising algorithm doubled SNR compared to non-denoised images and enhanced SNR by up to 29% compared to Wavelet denoising. The low-rank approach produced high-quality images even at later echo times, allowing reduced signal averaging. DMD effectively separated the SQ and TQ signals, even with missing RF phase cycle steps, resulting in superior Structural Similarity (SSIM) of 0.89±0.024 and lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.055±0.008 compared to conventional FT methods (SSIM=0.71±0.061, RMSE=0.144±0.036). This pipeline enabled high-quality 8x8x15mm
conclusionThe proposed pipeline improves robustness in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.