ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Imaging dose and image quality of kilovoltage imaging implemented on a helical tomotherapy unit.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and workflow efficiency of automated deep inspiration breath-hold for locoregional breast irradiation on a ring-gantry accelerator.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the imaging dose for the Accuray Radixact ClearRT system. Low-contrast resolution and CT number consistency was evaluated as well. CTDI measurements were compared to vendor supplied values, and similar measurements were done on a Varian TrueBeam kV cone-beam CT (CBCT) and a Philips Big Bore CT scanner. In-field imaging doses were measured using various protocols in an anthropomorphic phantom, while out-of-field doses were measured 10 cm from the imaging field edge. Comparison of the CTDI and the in-field doses showed considerable disagreement when the patient anatomy size was not congruent with the size of the CTDI phantom. While that is an expected outcome, this work provides an estimate of the differences for a variety of ClearRT protocols when this situation arises. The CNR was measured for all combinations of ClearRT settings for comparisons within the system, as well as for a comparison with a CBCT and fan-beam CT system. The CNR and dose information provided in this work can be used to aid in selecting a ClearRT imaging protocol. The CT number stability was tracked over 27 months; two instances where the CT number constancy exceeded tolerance were observed after service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.