Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843229›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2025

WHO guidelines on waist circumference and physical activity and their joint association with cancer risk.

Patricia Bohmann, Michael J Stein, Amina Amadou, Hansjörg Baurecht, Béatrice Fervers, Emma Fontvieille, Heinz Freisling, Christine Friedenreich, Julian Konzok, Laia Peruchet-Noray and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of Risk Perception Cut-Offs in Italian Brief PRHDS (PRHDS-BI): Implications for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Patricia BohmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany patricia.bohmann@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-8651
Michael J SteinDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-1751
Amina AmadouDepartment of Prevention Cancer Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Hansjörg BaurechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Béatrice FerversDepartment of Prevention Cancer Environment, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Emma FontvieilleNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Heinz FreislingNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Christine FriedenreichDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Julian KonzokDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Laia Peruchet-NorayNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Michael F LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anja M SedlmeierDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andrea WeberDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLow body fat and high physical activity levels are key lifestyle factors in cancer prevention, but the interplay of abdominal obesity and physical activity on cancer risk remains unknown. We explored individual and joint associations of waist circumference and physical activity with cancer risk.

methodsUsing UK Biobank data (n=315 457), we categorised individuals according to WHO guideline thresholds for waist circumference and self-reported physical activity levels. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs of total cancer. The reference group comprised individuals with recommended levels of waist circumference (<88 cm for women and <102 cm for men) and physical activity (>10 metabolic equivalent of task hours/week). Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of cancers attributable to abdominal obesity and insufficient physical activity.

resultsDuring a median follow-up period of 11 years (3 321 486 person-years), 29 710 participants developed any type of cancer. Participants not meeting the WHO guideline on waist circumference had increased cancer risk, even when sufficiently physically active according to the WHO (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.15). Similarly, individuals not achieving the WHO guideline for physical activity showed an elevated risk, even if they were abdominally lean (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07). Not adhering to either guideline yielded the strongest increase in risk (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.19). We estimated that abdominal obesity coupled with insufficient physical activity could account for 2.0% of UK Biobank cancer cases.

conclusionAdherence to both WHO guidelines for waist circumference and physical activity is essential for cancer prevention; meeting just one of these guidelines is insufficient.

Indexed as

ExerciseNeoplasmsObesity, AbdominalWaist CircumferenceAgedFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited KingdomWorld Health OrganizationBody compositionEpidemiologyPhysical activityRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39843229
PMCPMC11874282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.