Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39843204›Full record

SynthesisThoracic cancer2025

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors +/- Chemotherapy for Patients With NSCLC and Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Lauren Julia Brown, Nicholas Yeo, Harriet Gee, Benjamin Y Kong, Eric Hau, Inês Pires da Silva, Adnan Nagrial

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Tumorigenesis and Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Medulloblastoma: biology and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren Julia BrownFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-8392
Nicholas YeoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Harriet GeeFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Benjamin Y KongFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Eric HauFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Inês Pires da SilvaFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Adnan NagrialFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have demonstrated the intracranial efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) +/- chemotherapy. The efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy compared to ICI alone in patients with metastatic NSCLC and brain metastases (BM) remains unknown.

methodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to evaluate ICI efficacy and the influence of additional chemotherapy on survival outcomes in treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC with BM. Randomized phase II/III studies with at least one treatment arm with an ICI were eligible. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with and without BM were assessed.

resultsTen studies were included, totaling 6560 patients, 770 with BM. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that patients with BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy had improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.40-0.60) and OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.68) versus chemotherapy alone. Patients without BM treated with ICI +/- chemotherapy also had improved PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. In the network meta-analysis of patients with BM, chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved PFS compared to ICI alone (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.96; p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed in OS. In the population of patients without BM, no significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between chemoimmunotherapy versus ICI alone.

conclusionThis meta-analysis confirms that ICIs with or without chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone for the first-line management of metastatic NSCLC with and without BM. This network meta-analysis suggests combination chemoimmunotherapy offers PFS benefit over ICI monotherapy in BM patients, warranting direct comparisons in clinical trials.

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42024501345.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsbrain metastaseschemoimmunotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsnetwork meta‐analysisnon‐small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID39843204
PMCPMC11753865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.