Observational studyBMJ open2025
Feasibility of implementing family-integrated newborn care for hospitalised preterm and low birthweight infants in newborn care units of Ethiopia: a mixed-methods design.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07364903 (Effectiveness of Implementing Family-Integrated Newborn Care to Improve Outcomes for Preterm and Low-birth-weight Neonates in Resource-limited Settings; Quasi-experimental Design), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Implementing Family-Integrated Newborn Care to Improve Outcomes for Preterm and Low-birth-weight Neonates in Resource-limited Settings; Quasi-experimental Design
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and drivers to implementing family integrated newborn care for preterm and low birthweight infants in neonatal care units in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Ethical and management dilemmas in the care of the newborn at the limit of viability: a narrative review.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of implementing family-integrated newborn care (FINC) for hospitalised preterm and low birthweight infants in Ethiopia. Despite the WHO's call for family engagement in newborn care, evidence of the feasibility of implementation remains scarce.
designAn observational feasibility study employing a mixed-methods design comprising a quantitative cross-sectional survey among 157 healthcare providers (HCPs) and a qualitative Participatory Rural Appraisal.
settingThe study was conducted in 30 neonatal care units (NCUs) of hospitals in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.
participantsHCPs who were on duty in NCUs during the data collection period were included in the study. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were obtained for the quantitative data using STATA V.16, while qualitative data were coded and analysed using a framework analysis approach with qualitative data analysis software (Atlas.ti V.9).
resultsIn total, 157 HCPs were enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 32 (±6.8) years. Participants scored a higher weighted mean score for implementability (0.75) and a lower mean score for adaptability (0.50). Out of the 157 HCPs, the majority perceived that FINC was technically implementable (96%), conceptually acceptable (74%) and ethically correct (88%). Furthermore, 49% perceived that integrating FINC into the existing system was technically manageable, while 52% agreed that it was expandable to other healthcare facilities. However, HCPs reported lower confidence regarding its practicality (32%), integration (31%) and adaptability (16%). NCU space (97%), number of NCU rooms (87%) and increased risk of infection (83%) were perceived as potential challenges to the feasibility of FINC. More importantly, only 33% of HCPs felt that there was an organisational demand to consider FINC in NCUs. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant variation in the mean score for acceptability and perception of additional burden between age groups (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The current study shows that FINC is conceptually acceptable, technically implementable and expandable to other settings, with weighted mean scores of 0.75, 0.72 and 0.66, respectively. However, its practicality (0.53), integration (0.52) and adaptability (0.50) could be generally constrained mainly by the poor organisational infrastructure related to NCU space and infection prevention measures. Addressing motivational, attitudinal and competency gaps of NCU HCPs, along with organisational capacity, would be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.