ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
PERspectives on circadian cell biology.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clocks on steroids: how glucocorticoid receptors tell cells the time.The Journal of endocrinology · 2026Review
- Disordered but rhythmic-the role of intrinsic protein disorder in eukaryotic circadian timing.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- A cellular basis for the mammalian nocturnal-diurnal switch.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Magnesium: An overlooked signalling ion in plant physiology and circadian regulation.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Review
- Design of intrinsically disordered region binding proteins.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Time to start taking time seriously: how to investigate unexpected biological rhythms within infectious disease research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Circadian rhythm in mycotoxin-induced immunotoxicity: an emerging regulatory axis?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Daily rhythms in the activities of PERIOD proteins are critical to the temporal regulation of mammalian physiology. While the molecular partners and genetic circuits that allow PERIOD to effect auto-repression and regulate transcriptional programmes are increasingly well understood, comprehension of the time-resolved mechanisms that allow PERIOD to conduct this daily dance is incomplete. Here, we consider the character and controversies of this central mammalian clock protein with a focus on its intrinsically disordered nature.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Circadian rhythms in infection and immunity'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.