Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39842468›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

Trends and patterns of dual use of combustible tobacco and e-cigarettes among adults in England: A population study, 2016-2024.

Sarah E Jackson, Sharon Cox, Lion Shahab, Jamie Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying Latent Classes of Dual Cigarette/ENDS Users Based on Motivations for ENDS Use: Product Substitution Versus Complementary Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Associations of Close Social Connections With Smoking and Vaping: A Population Study in England.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-6168
Sharon CoxDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8494-5105
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-442X
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5428

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsE-cigarettes are frequently used by people who smoke. This study measured how the prevalence and patterns of smoking and vaping ('dual use') in England have changed as the vaping market has rapidly evolved.

designRepresentative monthly cross-sectional survey, July 2016 to April 2024.

settingEngland.

participants128 588 adults (≥18y). MEASUREMENTS: Logistic regression estimated associations between survey wave and dual use. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patterns of smoking and vaping, overall and by sociodemographic, smoking and vaping characteristics and harm perceptions of e-cigarettes vs. cigarettes.

findingsAcross the period, the overall prevalence of dual use increased non-linearly from 3.5% to 5.2% of adults [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.49 (1.25-1.76)]. Among adults who smoked, the proportion who also vaped was relatively stable up to mid-2021, at an average of 18.6% between July 2016 and May 2021, then increased rapidly to 34.2% by April 2024 [PR = 1.76 (1.48-2.09)]. This increase was greatest at younger ages [e.g. from 19.6% to 59.4% among 18- to 24-year-olds; PR = 3.04 (2.28-4.23)]. The most common pattern of dual use across the period was daily cigarette smoking with daily vaping [49.0% (47.3-50.8%)]. Over time, the proportion of dual users reporting daily cigarette smoking with non-daily vaping decreased [from 35.2% to 15.0%; PR = 0.43 (0.29-0.63)], offset primarily by an increase in the proportion reporting non-daily cigarette smoking with daily vaping [from 7.6% to 21.5%; PR = 2.84 (1.71-4.72)]. Daily cigarette smoking with daily vaping was more common (and non-daily cigarette smoking with daily vaping less common) among dual users who were older, less advantaged, mainly smoked hand-rolled cigarettes, had stronger urges to smoke and had been vaping for ≤6 months. Daily vaping was more common among dual users who thought e-cigarettes were less/equally harmful as cigarettes, or were unsure.

conclusionsIn England, vaping prevalence has increased rapidly among adults who smoke since 2021, which was when disposable e-cigarettes started to become popular. Since 2016, patterns of dual use have shifted away from more frequent smoking towards more frequent vaping. This may be the result of increasing prevalence of dual use among younger adults, who are more likely than older dual users to smoke non-daily and vape daily.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung Adultdual usee‐cigarettespopulation studysmokingtrendsvaping

Identifiers

PMID39842468
PMCPMC11907328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.