ArticleMethods of information in medicine2024
Deciphering Abbreviations in Malaysian Clinical Notes Using Machine Learning.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis is the first Malaysian machine learning model to detect and disambiguate abbreviations in clinical notes. The model has been designed to be incorporated into MyHarmony, a natural language processing system, that extracts clinical information for health care management. The model utilizes word embedding to ensure feasibility of use, not in real-time but for secondary analysis, within the constraints of low-resource settings.
methodsA Malaysian clinical embedding, based on Word2Vec model, was developed using 29,895 electronic discharge summaries. The embedding was compared against conventional rule-based and FastText embedding on two tasks: abbreviation detection and abbreviation disambiguation. Machine learning classifiers were applied to assess performance.
resultsThe Malaysian clinical word embedding contained 7 million word tokens, 24,352 unique vocabularies, and 100 dimensions. For abbreviation detection, the Decision Tree classifier augmented with the Malaysian clinical embedding showed the best performance (F-score of 0.9519). For abbreviation disambiguation, the classifier with the Malaysian clinical embedding had the best performance for most of the abbreviations (F-score of 0.9903).
conclusionDespite having a smaller vocabulary and dimension, our local clinical word embedding performed better than the larger nonclinical FastText embedding. Word embedding with simple machine learning algorithms can decipher abbreviations well. It also requires lower computational resources and is suitable for implementation in low-resource settings such as Malaysia. The integration of this model into MyHarmony will improve recognition of clinical terms, thus improving the information generated for monitoring Malaysian health care services and policymaking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.