Trial reportJMIR mental health2025
Integrating Videoconferencing Therapist Guidance Into Stepped Care Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 10 Years of BRAVE Self-Help Service Delivery for Child and Adolescent Anxiety in Australia: Open Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Who gets included? Equity in digital and decentralised mental health and neurodevelopmental trials: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Application of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for negative emotions in pregnant women: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) achieves greater reach than ICBT delivered with therapist guidance, but demonstrates poorer engagement and fewer clinical benefits. Alternative models of care are required that promote engagement and are effective, accessible, and scalable.
objectiveThis randomized trial evaluated whether a stepped care approach to ICBT using therapist guidance via videoconferencing for the step-up component (ICBT-SC[VC]) is noninferior to ICBT with full therapist delivery by videoconferencing (ICBT-TG[VC]) for child and adolescent anxiety.
methodsParticipants included 137 Australian children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years (male: n=61, 44.5%) with a primary anxiety disorder who were recruited from participants presenting to the BRAVE Online website. This noninferiority randomized trial compared ICBT-SC[VC] to an ICBT-TG[VC] program, with assessments conducted at baseline, 12 weeks, and 9 months after treatment commencement. All ICBT-TG[VC] participants received therapist guidance (videoconferencing) after each session for all 10 sessions. All ICBT-SC[VC] participants completed the first 5 sessions online without therapist guidance. If they demonstrated response to treatment after 5 sessions (defined as reductions in anxiety symptoms to the nonclinical range), they continued sessions without therapist guidance. If they did not respond, participants were stepped up to receive supplemental therapist guidance (videoconferencing) for the remaining sessions. The measures included a clinical diagnostic interview (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule) with clinician-rated severity rating as the primary outcome and parent- and child-reported web-based surveys assessing anxiety and anxiety-related interference (secondary outcomes).
resultsAlthough there were no substantial differences between the treatment conditions on primary and most secondary outcome measures, the noninferiority of ICBT-SC[VC] compared to ICBT-TG[VC] could not be determined. Significant clinical benefits were evident for participants in both treatments, although this was significantly higher for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants. Of the 89 participants (38 in ICBT-SC[VC] and 51 in ICBT-TG[VC]) who remained in the study, 26 (68%) in ICBT-SC[VC] and 45 (88%) in ICBT-TG[VC] were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis by the 9-month follow-up. For the intention-to-treat sample (N=137), 41% (27/66) ICBT-SC[VC], and 69% (49/71) ICBT-TG[VC] participants were free of their primary anxiety diagnosis. Therapy compliance was lower for the ICBT-SC[VC] participants (mean 7.39, SD 3.44 sessions) than for the ICBT-TG[VC] participants (mean 8.73, SD 3.08 sessions), although treatment satisfaction was moderate to high in both conditions.
conclusionsThis study provided further support for the benefits of low-intensity ICBT for children and adolescents with a primary anxiety disorder and highlighted the excellent treatment outcomes that can be achieved through therapist-guided ICBT delivered via videoconferencing. Although noninferiority of the stepped care adaptive approach could not be determined, it was acceptable to families, produced good outcomes, and could assist in increasing access to evidence-based care.
trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618001418268; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12618001418268.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.