Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841983›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Attitudes of German General Practitioners Toward eHealth Apps for Dementia Risk Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study.

Adrian Schultz, Melanie Luppa, Markus Bleckwenn, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Andrea Zuelke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian SchultzInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3634-9258
Melanie LuppaInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3927-6728
Markus BleckwennInstitute of General Practice, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1975-5369
Steffi G Riedel-Heller *Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-6090
Andrea Zuelke *Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-8573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth interventions constitute a promising approach to disease prevention, particularly because of their ability to facilitate lifestyle changes. Although a rather recent development, eHealth interventions might be able to promote brain health and reduce dementia risk in older adults.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) on the potentials and barriers of eHealth interventions for brain health. Understanding the perspective of GPs allows us to identify chances and challenges for implementing eHealth apps for dementia risk reduction.

methodsWe conducted semistructured expert interviews with 9 GPs working in an outpatient setting in and near Leipzig, Germany. Data were fully transcribed and analyzed using a process model of qualitative content analysis with codes and categories being constructed inductively and deductively.

resultsWe found generally favorable but balanced views of eHealth apps for brain health. Eight themes were identified and elaborated on in the data as follows: "addressing dementia," "knowledge about dementia," "need for information," "potential for prevention," "chances for apps for prevention," "development of apps for prevention," and "barriers of apps for prevention." GPs talked mostly about how and when to address dementia and the requirements for their use of eHealth apps for dementia prevention. GPs stated that they only addressed dementia once abnormalities were already present or less frequently when a patient or relative expressed a direct wish, while individual dementia risk or standardized diagnostic during routine check-ups were mentioned much less frequently. According to GPs, knowledge about dementia in patients was low; therefore, patients expressed little need for information on dementia risk factors and prevention in GP practices. Most patients wished for quick information regarding diagnostics, treatment options, and progression of the disease. GPs mentioned a lack of overview of the available eHealth apps and their content. They also expressed a fear of inducing health anxiety when talking to patients about risk factors and prevention.

conclusionsGPs want patients to receive relevant and individualized information. Prerequisites for the use of eHealth apps for dementia prevention were app characteristics related to design and content. GPs need to address dementia more routinely, assess relevant risk factors, and aid patients in a preventive role. Concerns were expressed over limited effectiveness, overwhelming patients, limited use in clinical practice, and only targeting patients with an already low risk of dementia.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDementiaGeneral PractitionersMobile ApplicationsRisk Reduction BehaviorTelemedicineAdultFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbrain healthdementiaeHealthlifestyleolder adultspreventionprimary carerisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39841983
PMCPMC11799816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.