ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Surface roughness of composite resins subjected to brushing with whitening toothpastes: an in vitro study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different dentifrices on surface roughness of conventional and additively manufactured resin-based restorative materials.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effects of sonic and micro-vibration electric toothbrushes on the surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Surface roughness changes in bulk-fill resin composites after simulated toothbrushing with whitening toothpastes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Surface degradation and digital volumetric loss in ceramic and hybrid CAD/CAM surfaces after simulated toothbrushing with activated charcoal vs. whitening toothpaste.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Toothbrush bristle type and toothpaste effect on surface gloss and microstructure of resin composites and zirconia.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of toothpastes containing different abrasive and whitening substances has been a constant concern among dental professionals. The aim of the present study was to perform an in vitro assessment of the surface topography of nanoparticle composite resins subjected to simulated brushing with dentifrices. Test samples were prepared with Filtek Universal (3M ESPE), Filtek Bulkfill (3M ESPE) and Z350 (3M ESPE), with 24 samples per resin. A testing machine was used to simulate brushing with the dentifrices Colgate Total 12, Oral B 100% and Oral B Gengiva Detox Gentle Whitening (8 samples per group). The constant speed of the machine was 250 cycles per minute, and 20.000 cycles were carried out, which corresponds to 24 months (1 hour and 20 minutes). Roughness features and qualitative surface topography were investigated. Statistical analysis involved the Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. A significant increase in surface roughness was found for all the resins (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found among the resins in terms of final roughness values (p = 0.690). In contrast, a significant difference among dentifrices was found with respect to roughness measurements (p < 0.001). The qualitative analysis revealed an increase in surface roughness in all the samples and differences in the abrasive potential of the dentifrices. In conclusion, brushing with dentifrices increases the surface roughness parameters of composite resin restorations. Moreover, the differences in the abrasive effects of the dentifrices indicate a need for further studies to establish efficacy and safety criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.