ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Brazilian version of the OHIP 14 Periodontal Disease Questionnaire: cross cultural adaptation and validation.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ozonated water to treat pericoronitis - insights from a randomized triple-blind pilot trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although it is recognized that periodontal disease negatively impacts quality of life, there is no validated instrument to assess this impact in Brazil. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the OHIP 14 PD (Oral Health Impact Profile Applied to Periodontal Diseases) for application among Brazilian patients. The original instrument was translated and validated into Brazilian Portuguese in a cross-sectional study with 110 participants recruited from a Dental School clinic. The sample was divided into two groups: 55 with periodontal disease and 55 without periodontal disease. The instrument was self-administered twice within an interval of 7 to 10 days for patients with periodontal disease. The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were verified using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and the reliability through the test-retest method (ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient), convergent validity (Spearman correlation), and discriminant validity (Mann-Whitney test), with p <0.05. Most of the sample consisted of women (n=69; ±40.65 years). The OHIP 14 DP - Br showed excellent internal consistency (α=0.997) and outstanding reliability using the test-retest method (ICC=0.945, p<0.001). There was a significant correlation between the scores obtained in all seven domains between this questionnaire and self-perceived gingival health (p=0.023). This study provides psychometric evidence supporting the cross-cultural validity of the OHIP 14 DP - Br version for use in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.