Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gaps in disability inclusion across universities in the United States.

Caroline Cerilli, Jiafeng Zhu, Varshini Varadaraj, Jessica Campanile, Fiona Sweeney, Jared Smith, Gayane Yenokyan, Bonnielin Swenor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline CerilliDisability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0892-2515
Jiafeng ZhuCenter for Education in Health Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Varshini VaradarajDisability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-1316
Jessica CampanileDisability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-0653
Fiona SweeneyDisability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2074-5611
Jared SmithWebAIM, Institute for Disability Research, Policy and Practice, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, United States of America.
Gayane YenokyanBiostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Bonnielin SwenorDisability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-0951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disabled people face social and environmental barriers to higher education, yet there is a dearth of clear, publicly available information on university websites related to accessibility and disability inclusion. Our team previously developed disability inclusion scores for the top 50 universities offering undergraduate programs based on funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and found low scores overall. Building on that, this study examines the relationship between disability inclusion (as scores ranging from 0 to 100 points) and six university characteristics for these 50 universities. The six university characteristics examined were U.S. News National Universities 2021 rankings, geographic region, year of institution founding, total number of undergraduates, public or private status of the university, and presence of an undergraduate disability studies program. Results indicate that university characteristics were not significantly associated with disability inclusion scores (p>0.05 for all university characteristics). The average scores across all categories of each characteristic fell below 72 points. These results indicate a gap in disability inclusion across all types of universities examined. Highly funded universities should evaluate their campuses for disability inclusion.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesHumansStudentsUnited StatesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID39841688
PMCPMC11753627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.