ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2025
Did selective kinase inhibitors change the management of patients with radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer?
Article in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and predictive nomograms for early mortality in patients with thyroid cancer lung metastasis based on the SEER database and a Chinese population study.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- FT3 and FT3/FT4 ratio are decreased and not compensated by levothyroxine treatment in TKI-treated thyroid cancer patients.Endocrine-related cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyse at our institution the criteria for selecting a first-line therapy for patients with advanced radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and their clinical responses, safety and survival outcomes. Patients and methods: We extracted data from 69 consecutive patients referred to Federico II University Hospital from September 2016 to September 2024, among whom 44 patients were treated with TKIs as first-line treatment and outside any clinical trial, and form the basis of this report. Results: Thirty-one (71%) patients were treated with the antiangiogenesis inhibitor lenvatinib and 13 (29%) were treated with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (s-TKIs). Among the latter, eight patients were treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (DT), two patients were treated with selpercatinib because of contraindications to lenvatinib, and three patients received DT as redifferentiation therapy. A RECIST partial response was observed in 28% of patients treated with lenvatinib, in 63% of those treated with DT and in one of the two patients treated with selpercatinib. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 13 (42%) patients treated with lenvatinib and only in 1 (9%) patient treated with DT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates at 1 year were 72% and 83% in lenvatinib-treated patients and 69% and 83% in DT-treated patients, respectively. In both selpercatinib-treated patients, the PFS at data cut-off was 10 months. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion: S-TKIs permitted tailoring systemic treatment based on disease location, tumour volume and patient comorbidities, achieving satisfactory tolerance and outcomes in selected patients with an actionable driver mutation and with contraindications to angiogenesis inhibitors or candidates for redifferentiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.