ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2025
Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma (TOP-NT) Pre-Clinical Consortium Study: A Synopsis.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardization of preclinical methodologies for discovery and validation of circulating microRNA biomarkers for post-traumatic epileptogenesis - Lessons learned from the EpiBioS4Rx Project 1.Epilepsy research · 2025Article
- Unbiased population-based statistics to obtain pathologic burden of injury after experimental TBI.Experimental neurology · 2025Article
- Unbiased Population-Based Statistics to Obtain Pathologic Burden of Injury after Experimental TBI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Improved Injury Detection Through Harmonizing Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data after Experimental TBI: A Translational Outcomes Project in NeuroTrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Improved injury detection through harmonizing multi-site neuroimaging data after experimental TBI: a Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma consortium study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has long been a leading cause of death and disability, yet research has failed to successfully translate findings from the pre-clinical, animal setting into the clinic. One factor that contributes significantly to this struggle is the heterogeneity observed in the clinical setting where patients present with injuries of varying types, severities, and comorbidities. Modeling this highly varied population in the laboratory remains challenging. Given feasibility constraints, individual laboratories often focus on single injury types and are limited to an abridged set of outcome measures. Furthermore, laboratories tend to use different injury or outcome methodologies from one another, making it difficult to compare studies and identify which pre-clinical findings may be best suited for clinical translation. The NINDS-funded Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma (TOP-NT) is a multi-site consortium designed to address the reproducibility, rigor, and transparency of pre-clinical development and validation of clinically relevant biomarkers for TBI. The current overview article provides a detailed description of the infrastructure and strategic approach undertaken by the consortium. We outline the TOP-NT strategy to address three goals: (1) selection and cross-center validation of biomarker tools, (2) development and population of a data infrastructure to allow for the sharing and reuse of pre-clinical, animal research following findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable data guidelines, and (3) demonstration of feasibility, reproducibility, and transparency in conducting a multi-center, pre-clinical research trial for TBI biomarker development. The synthesized scientific analysis and results of the TOP-NT efforts will be the topic of future articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.