Trial reportBlood2025
Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction in newly diagnosed myeloma: analysis of the MIDAS trial.
Trial report in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04934475 (MInimal Residual Disease Adapted Strategy), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MInimal Residual Disease Adapted Strategy: Frontline Therapy for Patients Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Less Than 66 Years; a Prospective Study
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Measurable Residual Disease-Guided Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Trial
- Longitudinal assessments of MRD in high-risk newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma in the BENEFIT study (IFM2020-05).HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) versus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) induction prior to autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant/transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Identification of Marker Immunoglobulin Rearrangements for Use by HAT-PCR in Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Response profile and long-term outcomes in Cyclin D1-overexpressing multiple myeloma: insights from the CASSIOPEIA trial.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- HAT-PCR is non-inferior to NGS when quantifying measurable residual disease for myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- t(11;14) multiple myeloma patient: minimal residual disease after 10 years of follow-up - a case report.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Review
- Evidence for the Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics to Guide Clinical Practice in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- What is the best induction for myeloma for the fit patient?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- The Strange Case of Functional High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients: Is It Possible to Identify Them in Clinical Practice?Cancers · 2025Article
- 35 years of academic trials focusing on high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) experience.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
- Current and future role of carfilzomib-based quadruplet combinations as therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.HemaSphere · 2025Review
- Current Treatment Strategies for Multiple Myeloma at First Relapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractFor patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, induction therapy with a quadruplet regimen before autologous transplant is the standard of care. The phase 3 IFM2020-02-MRD-adapted strategy (MIDAS) study assessed a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven consolidation and maintenance strategy after induction with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IsaKRD). We report safety and efficacy outcomes of six 28-day cycles of IsaKRD in 791 patients. The median age was 59 years; 13% had International Staging System (ISS) stage III, 5% Revised-ISS stage III, and 8% high-risk cytogenetics (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome linear predictor cytogenetic score of >1). Overall, 96% (N = 757) of patients completed induction. The median CD34+ cell yield was 7 × 106/kg, with 94% of patients able to proceed with a potential tandem transplant. The best overall response rate was 95%. In the intent-to-treat population, 91% achieved a very good partial response or better after induction, with MRD-negativity rates of 63% at 10-5 and 47% at 10-6. During induction, 7 patients experienced disease progression, and 5 died due to disease progression (n = 1), cardiac events (n = 2), or other causes (n = 2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and infections (7%); only 13% of patients reported any grade peripheral neuropathy. IsaKRD induction yielded deep responses and high MRD-negativity rates while ensuring successful stem cell collection, with no new safety signals. Continued follow-up of this ongoing study is required to confirm these findings. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04934475.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.