Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841360›Full record

SynthesisSpine deformity2025

Bracing effectiveness in idiopathic early onset scoliosis followed to skeletal maturity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matthew Bellamy, Wei Shao Tung, Raveen Jayasuriya, Daniel Hind, Lizzie Swaby, Nikki Totton, Ashley Cole

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew BellamyThe Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. Matthew.bellamy5@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7402-8049
Wei Shao TungThe Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Raveen JayasuriyaThe Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-9128
Daniel HindSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-4793
Lizzie SwabySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Nikki TottonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-2773
Ashley ColeThe Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. Ashley.cole4@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2504-2402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreating idiopathic Early Onset Scoliosis (idiopathic EOS) is challenging due to ongoing growth and extensive follow-ups. While bracing is effective for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), its value for children under 10 remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of spinal bracing in idiopathic EOS, followed to skeletal maturity.

methodsWe searched Ovid Medline and Web of Science until November 1st, 2023. Studies included idiopathic EOS patients between the ages of 3 and 10 (corresponding to Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis), followed to skeletal maturity, with no more than 25% initiating bracing after age 11. The primary outcome was the percentage undergoing scoliosis surgery. Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random effects model and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsOut of 417 studies, 15 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 868 patients. All were observational with a high risk of bias. The pooled percentage of patients undergoing surgery was 40% (95% CI 27-55%). The percentage of patients with a 5-degree progression or more and those progressing beyond 45 degrees were 44% (95% CI 24-66%) and 33% (95% CI 17-54%), respectively. Factors including larger initial Cobb angles, younger age, smaller in-brace correction, and poor compliance were identified as progression risk factors.

conclusionsBracing may prevent progression to surgery in idiopathic EOS when initiated early, but progression and surgery are still more common compared to adolescents. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis looking at the success of bracing in idiopathic EOS, followed up to skeletal maturity. The high bias and variability of included studies limit the strength of these conclusions, highlighting the need for high-quality research with innovative trial designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (systematic review of level IV studies).

Indexed as

BracesScoliosisAge of OnsetChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionHumansTreatment OutcomeBraceEarly onsetScoliosisSkeletal maturitySpineSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39841360
PMCPMC12021973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.