Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841353›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2025

An overview of the use of cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) modeling to produce synthetic medical data (SMD) in decentralized clinical machine learning (ML) for ovarian cancer(OC) and ovarian lymphoma(OL).

Diana Donatello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Diana Donatello, Costa Contina street n. 19, 66054, Vasto, Chieti, Italy. dianadonatello@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-4678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimo point out how novel analysis tools of AI can make sense of the data acquired during OL and OC diagnosis and treatment in an effort to help improve and standardize the patient pathway for these disease. MATERIAL AND

methodsultilizing programmed detection of heterogeneus OL and OC habitats through radiomics and correlate to imaging based tumor grading plus a literature review.

resultsnew analysis pipelines have been generated for integrating imaging and patient demographic data and identify new multi-omic biomarkers of response prediction and tumour grading using cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) in OL and OC. DESCRIPTION: deline the main AI methods used in OL and OC that we can try to standardize in the clinical radiological and medical practice to ameliorate the patients diagnosis and theraphy.

conclusionthrough new AI methods it's possible to combine research into a SwarmDeepSurv, generate new data flow channels, create medical imaging data channels of OL and OC using AI and identify new biomarkers of OL and OC. .

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLymphomaMachine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansArtificial intelligenceOvarian cancerOvarian lymphomaRadiomicsSwarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID39841353
PMCPMC12145400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.