Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841347›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2025

Novel pain management strategy for uterine fibroid embolization.

Elaine Ho, Kiat Tsong Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elaine HoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kiat Tsong TanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. kiattsong.tan@niagarahealth.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-3458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine fibroid embolization can be associated with significant pain due to fibroid ischemia and interventions of the procedure itself. Fentanyl and midazolam are commonly provided for sedation and pain relief, but are not tolerated by all patients. This report outlines a novel pain management strategy for uterine fibroid embolization in a patient who could not receive either opioids or benzodiazepines.

methodsA 51 year old woman presenting with menorrhagia due to uterine fibroids was referred to interventional radiology for embolization. She was allergic to most opiates and had previously become agitated with IV midazolam, resulting in termination of a previous attempt at embolization. Thus, a combination of three analgesic modalities was used: intraarterial ropivacaine in the uterine arteries, superior hypogastric nerve block with ropivacaine, and intravenous acetaminophen. The patient underwent successful embolization and reported only intermittent pain of 1-2 out of 10 intensity. DISCUSSION: This combined analgesic cocktail represents a novel alternative to traditional sedation for uterine fibroid embolization and may serve as a viable option for patients with similar contraindications.

Indexed as

EmbolizationFibroidNerve blockPain managementRopivacaineUterine artery embolizationUterine fibroid embolization

Identifiers

PMID39841347
PMCPMC11754559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.