ReviewDiscover oncology2025
Convergence of nanotechnology and artificial intelligence in the fight against liver cancer: a comprehensive review.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ferroptosis-cuproptosis crosstalk in hematological malignancies: multi-omics insights into gene-regulated cell death and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Comprehensive overview of AI methodologies in nano-drug delivery Optimization and Design.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-based immunotherapy: integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with current strategies in combating brain cancer disease.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Next-generation biomedical nanorobots: active design, intelligent control, and translational opportunities in regenerative and minimally invasive medicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence driven protein design and sustainable nanomedicine for advanced theranostics.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design and optimization of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for smart drug delivery.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Polymer Nanoparticles in Medical Applications-Future Directions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Coordination chemistry-enabled drug delivery systems: metal-ligand platforms for controlled release and targeted therapeutics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent Progress in Nanophotonics for Green Energy, Medicine, Healthcare, and Optical Computing Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- AI accelerate the identification of druggable targets by 3D structures of proteins and compounds.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Recent Trends in the Development and Clinical Translation of Polymer-based Targeted Therapeutic Nanoparticle.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles in HIV treatment for improved drug delivery, clinical translation, and future direction.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Enabled Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Theranostics, Combination Regimens, and Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Next-generation viral detection through AI-enhanced nanotechnology: advances, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Toward oral nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy: evidence mapping, route-specific validation, and translational challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Theranostic Nanoparticles in Prostate Cancer: Disrupting Hypoxia-Induced Glycolysis by Targeting Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha and Downstream Metabolites.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedicine: A Systematic Review from Nanomedicine to Neurology and Hepatology.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle technologies in precision oncology and personalized vaccine development: Challenges and advances.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver cancer is one of the most challenging malignancies, often associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Recent advancements in nanotechnology and artificial intelligence (AI) have opened new frontiers in the fight against this disease. Nanotechnology enables precise, targeted drug delivery, enhancing the efficacy of therapeutics while minimizing off-target effects. Simultaneously, AI contributes to improved diagnostic accuracy, predictive modeling, and the development of personalized treatment strategies. This review explores the convergence of nanotechnology and AI in liver cancer treatment, evaluating current progress, identifying existing research gaps, and discussing future directions. We highlight how AI-powered algorithms can optimize nanocarrier design, facilitate real-time monitoring of treatment efficacy, and enhance clinical decision-making. By integrating AI with nanotechnology, clinicians can achieve more accurate patient stratification and treatment personalization, ultimately improving patient outcomes. This convergence holds significant promise for transforming liver cancer therapy into a more precise, individualized, and efficient process. However, data privacy, regulatory hurdles, and the need for large-scale clinical validation remain. Addressing these issues will be essential to fully realizing the potential of these technologies in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.