Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841329›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025

Vascular Access and Closure Management for Electrophysiological Interventions: Small Interventions Big Impact.

Davide Fabbricatore, Katarzyna Malaczynska-Rajpold

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davide FabbricatoreHeart Division, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katarzyna Malaczynska-RajpoldHeart Division, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. kasia.rajpold@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThis review examines the role of vascular access and closure management in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures, emphasising their impact on patient outcomes and safety. It synthesises current evidence and highlights advancements, challenges, and opportunities in this critical area of EP practice. RECENT

findingsUltrasound-guided vascular access has significantly reduced complications and improved success rates compared to traditional methods. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) enable faster recovery and same-day discharge, becoming superior alternatives to manual compression. The "4P framework"- Plan, Prepare, Puncture, Protect- offers a structured approach to optimising vascular access. Alternative techniques, such as transhepatic and jugular access, are feasible in complex cases, though large-scale evidence is limited. Vascular access management is essential for EP procedures, demanding adequate planning and execution. While advancements in imaging and closure techniques enhance outcomes, further research is needed to standardise practices and evaluate long-term results. A personalised, systematic approach ensures optimal procedural success and patient care.

Indexed as

Electrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacVascular Closure DevicesHumansUltrasonography, InterventionalCardiac electrophysiologyUltrasound-guided techniquesVascular accessVascular closure devices

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.