Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841319›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Optimizing kinase and PARP inhibitor combinations through machine learning and in silico approaches for targeted brain cancer therapy.

Alireza Poustforoosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design, synthesis,Frontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alireza PoustforooshMedicinal and Natural Products Chemistry Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. alireza110_p@yahoo.com.

Funding

Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 30940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drug combination is an attractive approach for cancer treatment. PARP and kinase inhibitors have recently been explored against cancer cells, but their combination has not been investigated comprehensively. In this study, we used various drug combination databases to build ML models for drug combinations against brain cancer cells. Some decision tree-based models were used for this purpose. The results were further evaluated using molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The possibility of the hit drug combinations for crossing the Blood-brain barrier (BBB) was also examined. Based on the obtained results, the combination of niraparib, as the PARP inhibitor, and lapatinib, as the kinase inhibitor, exhibited more considerable outcomes with a remarkable model performance (accuracy of 0.915) and prediction confidence of 0.92. The protein tweety homolog 3 and BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 2 are the main targets of niraparib and lapatinib with - 10.2 and - 8.5 scores, respectively. Due to the outcomes, this drug combination can use the CAT1 transporter on the BBB surface and effectively cross the BBB. Based on the obtained results, niraparib-lapatinib can be a promising drug combination candidate for brain cancer treatment. This combination is worth to be examined by experimental investigation in vitro and in vivo.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMachine LearningPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsBlood-Brain BarrierComputer SimulationHumansIndazolesLapatinibMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Targeted TherapyPiperidinesIndazolesLapatinibniraparibPiperidinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsBrain cancerDrug combinationKinase inhibitorsMachine learningPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.