ReviewCalcified tissue international2025
The Use of Bone Biomarkers, Imaging Tools, and Genetic Tests in the Diagnosis of Rare Bone Disorders.
Review in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Software-based de-filtering restores quantitative accuracy in Clarity2D-enhanced whole-body bone scintigraphy.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- A practical use of bone turnover markers in management of patients with skeletal fragility.Endocrine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence and multimodal imaging in orthopaedics: from technological advances to clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare bone diseases are clinically and genetically heterogenous. Despite those differences, the underlying pathophysiology is not infrequently different. Several of these diseases are characterized by abnormal bone metabolism and turnover with subsequent abnormalities in markers of bone turnover, rendering them useful adjuncts in the diagnostic process. As most rare bone diseases are inherited, genetic testing for implicated pathogenic variants, where known, is another relevant tool that can aid in diagnosis. While some skeletal disorders can be localized or monostotic, others can involve multiple skeletal sites and warrant imaging tools to localize them and determine the severity of disease and/or presence of complications as well as to assess bone quality and the potential risk of fractures. Rare bone disorders pose a great challenge in their diagnosis, ultimately resulting in delayed diagnosis, higher risk of complications and a poor quality of life in affected individuals. In this review we discuss the biochemical and radiological tools that can be utilized to diagnose selected orphan bone disorders, the clinical utility and limitations of these diagnostic tools, and areas where future research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39841287What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.