ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
N-Glycosylation modulators for targeted manipulation of glycosylation for monoclonal antibodies.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operationalizing digital twins in biomanufacturing through interoperable process analytical technology.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- N-Glycosylation of Antibodies: Biological Effects During Infections and Therapeutic Applications.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies are extensively used as biotherapeutics for treatment of a variety of diseases. Glycosylation of therapeutic antibodies is considered a critical quality attribute as it influences the effector function, circulatory half-life, immunogenicity, and eventually efficacy and patient safety. During upstream process development, media components play a significant role in determining the glycosylation profile. In this study, we have evaluated 20 media additives (metal ions, vitamins, sugars, nucleosides). Six of the additives were shortlisted for their impact and then used to modulate the glycosylation profile of an in-house produced mAb (G0 2.38 ± 0.08%, G0F 75.58 ± 0.45%, G1F 10.07 ± 0.04%, G2F 0.54 ± 0.01%, G0F-N 5.84 ± 0.32%, sialylation 1.60 ± 0.33%, mannosylation 1.56 ± 0.39%) to achieve the glycan profile of a commercially available reference product (G0 2.49 ± 0.07%, G0F 37.83 ± 0.37%, G1F 34.77 ± 0.03%, G2F 4.87 ± 0.01%, G0F-N 2.34 ± 0.12%, sialylation 9.84 ± 0.30%, mannosylation 2.86 ± 0.29%). The proposed approach yielded us a glycan profile (G0 2.10 ± 0.07%, G0F 38.00 ± 0.49%, G1F 31.92 ± 0.09%, G2F 5.26 ± 0.54%, G0F-N 1.92 ± 0.02%, sialylation 10.28 ± 1.68%, mannosylation 3.12 ± 0.29%) that was near identical to that of the reference product. Equally importantly, other quality attributes including charge variants, aggregates, titer, and viability were not found to be significantly impacted by the addition of the additives under consideration. KEY POINTS: • Screened 20 media additives to evaluate their effect on glycosylation of mAbs. • Developed glycosylation indices models to evaluate the effect of various additives. • Additive concentrations were optimized to target the reference product profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.