Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39841261›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2025

The role of nanoparticles in transforming plant genetic engineering: advancements, challenges and future prospects.

Neelam Rani, Kusum Kumari, Vinita Hooda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neelam RaniDepartment of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, India.
Kusum KumariDepartment of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, India.
Vinita HoodaDepartment of Botany, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, India. vinitahooda@yahoo.co.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite years of progress in biotechnology, altering the genetic makeup of many plant species, especially their plastids, remains challenging. The existence of a cell wall poses a significant obstacle to the effectual transportation of biomolecules. Developing efficient methods to introduce genes into plant cells and organelles without causing harm is an ongoing area of research. Traditional approaches like Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, biolistic particle delivery, electroporation and polyethylene glycol (PEG) transformation have shown some success but come with limitations like laborious, time-consuming and causing tissue damage. For instance, the Agrobacterium method can be applied only to the restricted host range, while PEG transformation and biolistic particle delivery are not very efficient. In contrast, nanotechnology made an appearance in the field of genetic engineering. Nanoparticles act as delivery vehicles for many cargos in animals. However, in plants, the application of nanocarriers for the delivery of biomolecules is still in its infant stage. Nonetheless, it holds immense potential for the future of plant biotechnology and genome editing.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringNanoparticlesPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedTransformation, GeneticGene EditingCarbon nanotubesGenetic transformationGenome editingNanoparticlesPolyethylene glycol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.