ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Spleen stiffness in a healthy pediatric population undergoing liver magnetic resonance elastography.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSplenic stiffness is a potential imaging marker of portal hypertension. Normative spleen stiffness values are needed to define diagnostic thresholds.
objectiveTo report stiffness measurements of the spleen in healthy children undergoing liver magnetic resonance (MR) elastography across MRI vendors and field strengths. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of data collected under a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Volunteers aged 7-17.9 years without a known history of liver or spleen disease were recruited for a research MRI between February 2018 and October 2019. Gradient recalled echo (GRE) or spin-echo-echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography was performed on a total of three vendor platforms and at two field strengths (1.5 T (T) and 3 T) with standard right upper quadrant passive driver placement (frequency of 60 Hz). Two independent reviewers measured spleen stiffness, length, and volume. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney test, and Pearson's or Spearman's correlation were used.
resultsFrom 101 study volunteers, 72 (34 female) had measurable splenic stiffness. Median age was 12 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.9-14.9 years). Mean (± SD) spleen stiffness was 4.7 ± 0.9 kPa (IQR, 3.8-5.4 kPa) with 6.1 kPa reflecting the 95th percentile. Strong correlation was observed between reviewers (ICC = 0.89 [95%CI, 0.71-0.93; P < 0.001]). Male volunteers had slightly higher splenic stiffness compared to females: 4.9 ± 0.9 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 kPa (P = 0.014). There was significant correlation between spleen stiffness and body mass index (r = 0.33 [95%CI, 0.06-0.56; P = 0.024]) but no other measure of patient size (r = 0.15-0.29). No significant difference in spleen stiffness was observed across vendors (P = 0.089) or field strengths (P = 0.236).
conclusionMR elastography-based spleen stiffness, measured as part of a liver MR elastography acquisition, is < 6.1 kPa in a healthy pediatric population and does not vary with MRI vendor or field strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.