ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2025
Usefulness of serum HBV RNA levels for predicting antiviral response to entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of baseline HBcAg and HBV DNA with persistent detectability of HBV RNA during NA therapy.PloS one · 2026Article
- The clinical significance and optimization strategies of HBeAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Hepatitis B virus RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics predict treatment outcomes in children with chronic hepatitis B.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Innate immune recognition and evasion strategies of hepatitis B virus: from DNA to RNA and viral proteins.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Utility of Serum HBV RNA Measurement During Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analog Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA is an important serum biomarker of hepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) transcriptional activity; however, its clinical characteristics remain unclear. This study evaluated the clinical utility of HBV RNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
methodsWe studied 87 CHB patients with serum HBV DNA levels ≥ 5.0 log IU/mL who initiated entecavir (ETV) treatment between 2000 and 2018. Serum HBV RNA levels were measured at three-time points: before ETV treatment, at 12 weeks, and at 48 weeks after starting ETV treatment. Clinical markers associated with the antiviral effects of ETV treatment were analyzed.
resultsSerum HBV RNA levels decreased in both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients during the observation period. In HBeAg-positive patients, multivariable analysis showed that lower HBV RNA levels at 48 weeks of ETV treatment were independently associated with HBeAg seroconversion. Additionally, lower baseline HBV RNA levels significantly predicted virologic response in those patients. In contrast, among HBeAg-negative patients, lower HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels and the FIB-4 index were independently associated with virologic response. In HBeAg-positive patients, those with higher baseline HBV RNA levels showed a more significant reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen levels.
conclusionSerum HBV RNA levels predicted HBeAg seroconversion and early HBV DNA reduction in HBeAg-positive patients, while HBcrAg was significantly associated with virologic response in HBeAg-negative patients. These findings highlight the different predictive roles of HBV RNA and HBcrAg based on HBeAg status, which may provide individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.